Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) vs Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) vs Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) Mazda ₱1,395,000 | Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026) Hyundai ₱1,378,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5 years or 200,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 115 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 144 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | IVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4610 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1820 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1740 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2780 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2055 | 1272 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 40 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Creamy White Pearl, Dragon Red Pearl, Magnetic Silver Metallic, Midnight Black Pearl, Titan Gray Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/50R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/50R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Manual Airconditioning Dual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) vs Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle with good power-to-weight ratio, the Mazda BT-50 is the better choice. It offers more torque and power than the Hyundai Stargazer and comes in a more robust build quality. The BT-50's 4×2 setup makes it ideal for off-road driving and towing tasks, which are common needs here.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The data doesn't specify fuel efficiency, but the Hyundai Stargazer is available with a naturally aspirated engine while the Mazda BT-50 uses a turbo diesel. Generally, diesels can be more efficient than petrol engines.
What's the difference in power between the two vehicles?
The Mazda BT-50 has 150 PS of max power at 3700 rpm, while the Hyundai Stargazer has only 115 PS. The BT-50 also produces more torque (375 Nm vs 144 Nm).
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda BT-50's front-wheel drive setup and its robust construction make it a good choice for daily use, especially if the buyer needs to carry heavy loads or tow. The Hyundai Stargazer's all-wheel-drive system might be more suitable for varied weather conditions.
Which vehicle has a better warranty?
The Mazda BT-50 comes with a 100,000 km/3-years warranty, while the Hyundai Stargazer offers a 5 years or 200,000 kms warranty. The BT-50's shorter warranty period is less favorable.