Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) Mazda ₱1,350,000 | Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026) Hyundai ₱1,378,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5 years or 200,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 115 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 144 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | IVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4610 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1820 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1740 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2780 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2052 | 1272 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 40 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Creamy White Pearl, Dragon Red Pearl, Magnetic Silver Metallic, Midnight Black Pearl, Titan Gray Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/50R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/50R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Manual Airconditioning Dual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Hyundai Stargazer 1.5 GLS Premium X IVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with good power-to-weight ratio, the Mazda BT-50 is a solid choice. Its inline-4 turbo diesel engine provides decent performance without excessive fuel consumption. The Hyundai Stargazer, while offering better comfort due to its unibody construction and more seats, falls short in terms of power and practicality for daily commuting. For those who prioritize affordability, the Mazda BT-50 is a slightly better value with a lower price tag and longer warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Mazda BT-50's engine type (turbo diesel) generally offers better fuel economy compared to the Hyundai Stargazer's naturally aspirated gasoline engine.
Which car is more powerful?
The Mazda BT-50 with its 150 PS from a turbo diesel engine outperforms the Hyundai Stargazer which has only 115 PS from a naturally aspirated gasoline engine.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
Given that the Mazda BT-50 offers more power and reliability, it might be better suited for daily commuting compared to the Hyundai Stargazer's comfort but less practical features.
Which car has a longer warranty?
The Hyundai Stargazer comes with a 5-year or 200,000 km warranty, while the Mazda BT-50 offers only a 3-years/100,000 km warranty.