Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2017) Mazda ₱2,200,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) Nissan ₱2,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2191cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 175 PS @ 4500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 420 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed AT | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4550 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1680 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1668 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 19 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R19 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R19 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Mazda CX‑5 2.2 SkyActiv‑D (2017) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on intended use. The CX‑5 is a compact crossover priced at ₱2,200,000, offering a turbo‑charged diesel engine that delivers 175 PS and 420 Nm, paired with a 6‑speed automatic and all‑wheel drive. Its unibody construction, 5‑door layout and 2+3 seating make it agile for city driving, weekend trips and small families who value performance, fuel efficiency and a higher‑end feel. The NV350 is a van priced slightly lower at ₱2,165,000, with a larger 2.5‑L diesel producing 129 PS and 356 Nm, a 5‑speed automatic and rear‑wheel drive. Built on a body‑on‑frame chassis with three doors, it is designed for maximum passenger or cargo capacity, ideal for businesses, shuttle services or large families needing up to 15 seats (though seating detail isn’t listed). If you need a versatile, sporty SUV for everyday commuting and occasional off‑road confidence, the CX‑5 is the better pick. If your priority is bulk transport, cargo space and a marginally lower price, the NV350 Urvan is the practical choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT is priced at ₱2,165,000, which is ₱35,000 less than the Mazda CX‑5’s ₱2,200,000 price.
Which model has more power?
The Mazda CX‑5’s 2.2 L turbo diesel produces 175 PS, while the Nissan NV350’s 2.5 L diesel makes 129 PS, so the CX‑5 is more powerful.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The CX‑5, with its compact crossover size, all‑wheel drive, 6‑speed automatic and 5‑door layout, offers easier maneuverability and comfort for daily city use compared to the larger, three‑door van.
Which vehicle offers more practical space for transporting many passengers?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan, built as a van with body‑on‑frame construction and designed for high passenger capacity, is more suitable for moving many people or cargo than the 5‑door CX‑5 crossover.