Ford Mustang Fastback 2.3L EcoBoost Premium (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Mustang Fastback 2.3L EcoBoost Premium (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Fastback 2.3L EcoBoost Premium (2018) Ford ₱2,798,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) Nissan ₱2,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2253cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 15:1 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 314 PS @ 5500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 475 Nm @ 3000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | S | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4784 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1916 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1381 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2720 | 2940 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2255 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | — | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | — | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | — | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Drum |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Air Conditioning | — | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Seat Material | — | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | — | Manual |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Headlights | — | Halogen |
Ford Mustang Fastback 2.3L EcoBoost Premium (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose priority is performance, style and weekend driving thrills, the 2018 Ford Mustang Fastback 2.3L EcoBoost Premium is the clear choice. It costs about ₱633,000 more than the Nissan NV350 Urvan, but delivers 314 PS and 475 Nm of torque, a turbocharged inline‑four paired with a 6‑speed automatic and rear‑wheel drive, making it far quicker and more engaging than the van’s 129 PS and 356 Nm. The Mustang’s coupe body, two‑door layout and 2+2 seating suit a small family or a couple who want a sports car experience, while its unibody construction adds a modern feel. Conversely, the NV350 Urvan is built for practicality: a body‑on‑frame van with three doors, a higher seating capacity for up to 15 passengers (implied by its segment), and a diesel engine that favors low‑end torque for load‑carrying and fuel economy. It is priced lower at ₱2,165,000 and offers multiple exterior colors, making it ideal for small businesses, shuttle services, or large families needing space. In short, choose the Mustang if you value power, prestige and driving excitement; choose the Urvan if you need cargo/passenger capacity, lower purchase cost and diesel efficiency for daily commuting or commercial use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT is priced at ₱2,165,000, which is about ₱633,000 less than the Ford Mustang’s ₱2,798,000 price.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Mustang Fastback 2.3L EcoBoost produces 314 PS and 475 Nm of torque, far exceeding the NV350 Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Is the Mustang suitable for daily commuting?
While the Mustang offers strong performance, its two‑door coupe layout and limited rear seating make it less practical for typical family or work commuting compared to the van’s spacious interior.
What are the drivetrain differences?
Both models are rear‑wheel drive, but the Mustang uses a 6‑speed automatic with a sport‑oriented setup, whereas the Urvan has a 5‑speed automatic geared for load‑carrying and diesel efficiency.