Suzuki Vitara GL+ (2018) vs Toyota Rush 1.5 G A/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Vitara GL+ (2018) vs Toyota Rush 1.5 G A/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Vitara GL+ (2018) Suzuki ₱988,000 | Toyota Rush 1.5 G A/T (2018) Toyota ₱1,070,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1586cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 115 PS @ 6000 rpm | 102 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 156 Nm @ 4400 rpm | 134 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 4-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4175 | 4435 |
| Width (mm) | 1775 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1610 | 1705 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2500 | 2685 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1120 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 47 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut, Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam with Coil spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16 Alloy | 17 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Alloy | 17 alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/60 R16 | — |
| Rear Tires | 215/60 R16 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Keep comparing
Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.
Suzuki Vitara GL+ (2018) vs Toyota Rush 1.5 G A/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a crossover with good power and reliability, the Suzuki Vitara GL+ is recommended. It offers better fuel efficiency and more torque compared to the Toyota Rush, making it suitable for urban driving conditions. The Toyota Rush, despite its higher displacement engine, has less powerful outputs and a different transmission type which might affect daily commuting needs.