Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Mercedes-Benz CLA AMG 35 4Matic (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Mercedes-Benz CLA AMG 35 4Matic (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 | Mercedes-Benz CLA AMG 35 4Matic (2024) Mercedes-Benz ₱5,719,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 2 years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 394 PS | 306 PS @ 5800 rpm |
| Max Torque | 676 Nm | 400 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 1991cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Premium Sedan |
| Segment | SUV | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow | Polar White, Night Black, Iridium Silver, Rose Gold, Digital White Metallic, Sun Yellow, Denim Blue Metallic, Red Metallic, Mountain Grey Metallic, Mountain Grey Magno |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4713 | 4688 |
| Width (mm) | 1881 | 1999 |
| Height (mm) | 1627 | 1444 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2984 | 2729 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2084 | 1590 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 50 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/55R19 | 255/45R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55R19 | 255/45R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Mercedes-Benz CLA AMG 35 4Matic (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, practicality and performance, the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD emerges as the more sensible choice for most daily needs. Priced at ₱3.5 million, it is roughly ₱2.2 million cheaper than the Mercedes‑Benz CLA AMG 35 4Matic, yet it delivers substantially higher output – 394 PS and 676 Nm of torque versus the CLA’s 306 PS and 400 Nm. The Mach‑E’s electric drivetrain also means lower operating costs and eligibility for any future EV incentives, while its five‑door midsize crossover body offers greater cargo flexibility and a 2+3 seating layout, ideal for families or car‑pooling. Its 3‑year/100,000 km warranty adds peace of mind compared with the CLA’s 2‑year warranty. The CLA, however, may appeal to buyers who prioritize a traditional gasoline‑powered premium sedan feel, a sleek four‑door silhouette and a brand‑centric AMG badge, and who are less sensitive to price. It still offers strong performance for its class, but its higher price, lower torque and limited rear‑seat access make it less versatile for everyday Filipino road conditions. In summary, unless the AMG badge and sedan styling are non‑negotiable, the Mustang Mach‑E provides superior power, lower price, more space and a longer warranty, making it the better overall value for most Filipino motorists.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD costs ₱3,499,000, which is about ₱2,219,000 less than the Mercedes‑Benz CLA AMG 35 4Matic priced at ₱5,719,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mustang Mach‑E produces 394 PS and 676 Nm of torque, surpassing the CLA’s 306 PS and 400 Nm.
Is the Mach‑E more practical for families?
Yes; its five‑door crossover body and 2+3 seating configuration provide easier rear‑seat access and more cargo flexibility than the CLA’s four‑door sedan layout with a fixed five‑seat arrangement.
What are the warranty differences?
Ford offers a 3‑year or 100,000 km warranty, whereas Mercedes‑Benz provides a 2‑year warranty, giving the Mach‑E a longer protection period.