Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,820,000 | Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020) Mitsubishi ₱1,927,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2023 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1996cc | 2442cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm | 181 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-A/T | 8-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver | White Diamond, Jet Black Mica, Blade Silver Metallic |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 4785 |
| Width (mm) | 1918 | 1815 |
| Height (mm) | 1884 | 1805 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3270 | 2800 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1953 | 1910 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 68 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/70/R16 | 265/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70/R16 | 265/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with good power-to-price ratio, the Ford Ranger stands out as the better choice. It offers more torque at lower RPMs, which is beneficial for off-road driving and city commuting. The Mitsubishi Montero Sport, while powerful, is significantly more expensive and less practical.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Montero Sport?
The Ford Ranger is cheaper with a price of ₱1,820,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Montero Sport at ₱1,927,000.
Which vehicle provides more power?
Both vehicles offer similar power outputs but the Ford Ranger has slightly higher torque figures which can be advantageous in certain driving conditions.
Is one vehicle better for daily commuting than the other?
The Ford Ranger is a better choice for daily commuting due to its lower RPM torque, making it more efficient and easier on the engine during city driving.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
The Ford Ranger comes with a 5-year/150,000km warranty, while the Mitsubishi Montero Sport offers only a 3-year/100,000km warranty.