GAC Hyptec HT Ultra (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of GAC Hyptec HT Ultra (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | GAC Hyptec HT Ultra (2026) GAC ₱2,580,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) Nissan ₱2,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 8 years or 160,000 kms | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 340 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Displacement | — | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Premium Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | MX | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Spinel Gray, Onyx Black, Crystal Silver, Alpine White, Star Rose, Agate Purple | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4935 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1920 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1700 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2935 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2180 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 245/50R20 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 245/50R20 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 22 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
GAC Hyptec HT Ultra (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the GAC Hyptec HT Ultra (2026) and Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) serve very different purposes. The GAC is a premium electric crossover SUV priced at ₱2.58M, offering 340 PS and 380 Nm of instant torque from its electric motor, with a modern unibody construction and a longer 8-year/160,000 km warranty. It seats 5 and is ideal for daily commuting, tech enthusiasts, and those with charging access. However, its price is ₱415,000 higher than the Nissan. The Nissan, at ₱2.165M, is a diesel turbo van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, body-on-frame construction, and only 3 doors—better suited for cargo or passenger transport (though seating capacity isn't specified, vans typically seat 8+). It's more affordable and runs on diesel, but its 2018 model year, shorter 3-year warranty, and lower power make it less appealing for personal daily use. Choose the GAC if you prioritize performance, modernity, and electric driving. Choose the Nissan if you need a rugged, spacious van for work or family hauling and want lower upfront cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium is cheaper with a price of ₱2,165,000, while the GAC Hyptec HT Ultra costs ₱2,580,000—a difference of ₱415,000.
Which is more powerful?
The GAC Hyptec HT Ultra is significantly more powerful with 340 PS and 380 Nm from its electric motor, compared to the Nissan's 129 PS and 356 Nm from its diesel engine.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The GAC Hyptec HT Ultra is better for daily commuting due to its electric motor (lower running costs), automatic transmission, and crossover SUV comfort. The Nissan, being a van with a diesel engine, is less refined and better suited for work or hauling.
Which has a longer warranty?
The GAC Hyptec HT Ultra offers an 8-year/160,000 km warranty, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium has only a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, making GAC's coverage much more extensive.