Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,488,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) Nissan ₱2,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1993cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid | Diesel |
| Max Power | 148 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 183 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | E-CVT | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | SUV | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4691 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1866 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1681 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1750 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 57 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 235/60R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 235/60R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality between the Honda CR‑V 2.0 VX e:HEV E‑CVT (2026) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018), the decision hinges on intended use and budget. The CR‑V is priced at ₱2,488,000 and offers a hybrid powertrain with 148 PS and 183 Nm of torque, delivered through an E‑CVT for smooth city driving. It is a midsize crossover SUV with 5 doors and seating for five, making it ideal for families needing everyday passenger capacity and a more fuel‑efficient option. The NV350 Urvan, priced lower at ₱2,165,000, is a diesel van with 129 PS and a substantially higher torque of 356 Nm from its turbocharged engine, transmitted via a 5‑speed automatic. Its body‑on‑frame construction and rear‑wheel drive cater to heavier cargo or commercial use, but it only seats three and lacks the hybrid efficiency of the CR‑V. If you need a versatile, eco‑friendly SUV for daily commuting and occasional family trips, the CR‑V is the better fit despite its higher price. If your priority is lower upfront cost and greater towing or cargo capability for business use, the NV350 Urvan offers more power and a lower purchase price. Ultimately, choose based on whether passenger comfort or cargo performance is paramount.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT costs ₱2,165,000, while the Honda CR‑V 2.0 VX e:HEV E‑CVT is priced at ₱2,488,000.
Which has more power?
The Honda CR‑V delivers 148 PS, whereas the Nissan NV350 Urvan provides 129 PS; thus the CR‑V has higher power output.
Which offers better torque?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan has a higher torque of 356 Nm compared to the CR‑V’s 183 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR‑V, being a hybrid with an E‑CVT and a passenger‑friendly SUV layout, is more suitable for daily commuting and family use.