Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 | Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024) Mercedes-Benz ₱9,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 2 years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Electric Motor |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Max Power | 229 PS | 360 PS |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 800 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Premium Sedan |
| Segment | Crossover | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Graphite Grey Metallic, Polar White, Obsidian Black, Onyx Black Metallic, Nautical Blue Metallic, Sonoran Brown Metallic, Twilight Blue Metallic, Cirrus Silver Metallic, Moonlight White Metallic, Patagonia Red Metallic, Silicon Grey, China Blue, Kalahari |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 5223 |
| Width (mm) | 1800 | 1923 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1512 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 3210 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2005 | 2610 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Multi-link with Airmatic |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-link with Airmatic |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 21 |
| Front Tires | 255/45R20 | 255/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 255/45R20 | 255/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | — | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 15 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024): which should you buy?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) and Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024) are both premium electric vehicles, but they serve very different buyer profiles in the Philippines. At ₱3.698 million, the IONIQ 5 is significantly more affordable than the EQS at ₱9.99 million—a difference of over ₱6.2 million. The IONIQ 5 is a practical midsize crossover SUV with 229 PS and 350 Nm, offering decent performance and a spacious 5-seat cabin. It rides on a unibody construction and comes with a reassuring 5-year/200,000km warranty. In contrast, the EQS sedan delivers a staggering 360 PS and 800 Nm, enabling effortless acceleration, plus all-wheel drive for better traction. Its interior is more luxurious, but it's a sedan with slightly tighter rear headroom (1512 mm height vs 1605 mm) and only a 2-year warranty. For most Filipino buyers, the IONIQ 5 is the smarter choice: it's cheaper, more practical as an SUV, and backed by a longer warranty. The EQS is only for those who demand extreme performance, prestige, and are willing to pay a premium for a luxury badge. If budget and everyday usability are key, pick the Hyundai. If you want a high-performance luxury EV and money is no object, the Mercedes-Benz is the one.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range is significantly cheaper at ₱3,698,000 compared to the Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line at ₱9,990,000.
Which car is more powerful?
The Mercedes-Benz EQS produces 360 PS and 800 Nm, far exceeding the Hyundai IONIQ 5's 229 PS and 350 Nm. The EQS also has all-wheel drive for better acceleration and traction.
Which car has a better warranty?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 offers a 5-year/200,000km warranty, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS comes with only a 2-year warranty.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, longer warranty, and more practical SUV body style with higher ground clearance. The EQS is larger and more powerful but less cost-effective for everyday use.