Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,068,000 | Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) Mazda ₱3,780,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 168 PS | 300.9 PS |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 603 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Artisan Red Premium, Sonic Silver, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue Mica, Rhodium White |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 7 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 5120 |
| Width (mm) | 1890 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 3120 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1880 | 2140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 74 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 21 |
| Front Tires | 235/55R19 | 275/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55R19 | 275/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, power and practicality, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range stands out as the more balanced choice. Priced at ₱3,068,000 versus the Mazda CX‑90’s ₱3,780,000, it offers a lower entry cost and a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty that outperforms Mazda’s 3‑year/100,000 km coverage. The IONIQ 5 delivers a respectable 168 PS and 350 Nm from its electric motor, while the CX‑90’s turbocharged 3.3L inline‑4 produces a higher 300.9 PS and 603 Nm, but at the expense of fuel type—gasoline versus electric. In terms of daily commuting, the IONIQ 5’s electric powertrain means zero fuel costs and lower maintenance, whereas the CX‑90 offers more seating (7 vs. 5) for families needing extra capacity and an all‑wheel‑drive system for varied road conditions. The IONIQ 5’s midsize crossover body and RWD layout suit city driving, while the CX‑90’s large crossover and AWD provide a more robust off‑road capability. Ultimately, if budget, lower running costs, and a modern electric platform are priorities, the IONIQ 5 is the better pick. If you need a larger vehicle with more power and seating for long trips or off‑road adventures, the CX‑90 justifies its higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range costs ₱3,068,000, while the Mazda CX‑90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo is ₱3,780,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX‑90 produces 300.9 PS and 603 Nm, whereas the Hyundai IONIQ 5 delivers 168 PS and 350 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 5’s electric motor provides zero fuel costs and lower maintenance, making it ideal for daily commuting.
Which offers more seating capacity?
The Mazda CX‑90 seats 7 passengers, while the Hyundai IONIQ 5 seats only 2+3 (5 total).