Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 | Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024) Nissan ₱3,988,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 304 PS | 383 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 608 Nm | 475 Nm @ 1600 - 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 9-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Displacement | — | 2997cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Large Crossover SUV | Premium Sports |
| Segment | Crossover | Coupe |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey | Boulder Grey Pearl / Black Roof, Everest White / Black Roof, Seiran Blue / Black Roof, Passion Red / Black Roof, Ikazuchi Yellow / Black Roof, Black Diamond Pear |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 5060 | 4380 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1790 | 1315 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3130 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2505 | 1647 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 62 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 21 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 21 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 285/45R21 | 255/40/R19 |
| Rear Tires | 285/45R21 | 275/35/R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather-Suede |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 14 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024): which should you buy?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range and Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT serve completely different purposes. For Filipino families needing a spacious, eco-friendly daily driver with seven seats and AWD, the IONIQ 9 is the clear choice. It offers a large crossover body, 2+2+3 seating, 608 Nm of instant torque, and a 5-year warranty—ideal for long commutes and road trips. However, it costs ₱4,580,000, which is ₱592,000 more than the Z. The Nissan Z is a dedicated sports coupe with a turbocharged 3.0L inline-4 producing 383 PS and 475 Nm, paired with a 9-speed automatic and RWD. It’s more powerful in horsepower, lighter, and designed for driving enthusiasts who prioritize performance and style over practicality. Its 3-year warranty and two-seat layout limit its everyday use. If you need a versatile family EV, buy the IONIQ 9. If you want an exhilarating weekend car and don’t need back seats, the Z offers better value at a lower price.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT is cheaper at ₱3,988,000, while the Hyundai IONIQ 9 costs ₱4,580,000, a difference of ₱592,000.
Which has more power?
The Nissan Z has higher maximum power at 383 PS vs. the IONIQ 9’s 304 PS. However, the IONIQ 9 delivers higher torque (608 Nm vs. 475 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 9 is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain (lower running costs), spacious 7-seat cabin, and AWD traction. The Z is a cramped 2-seater with a firm sporty ride.
Which is more practical for a family?
The IONIQ 9 is far more practical with 7 seats, 5 doors, and a large crossover body. The Z is a 2-seat coupe with limited cargo space.