Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024) Mazda ₱2,580,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) Nissan ₱2,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 5 years or 100,000 kms | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 184 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sports Coupe | Van |
| Segment | Roadster | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Jet Black, Soul Red, Snowflake White Pearl, Machine Grey, Eternal Blue | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 3915 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1735 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1235 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2310 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1138 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/45R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality against performance, the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT emerges as the more sensible choice for daily family or business use, while the Mazda MX‑5 RF 2.0‑L AT Black Leather caters to enthusiasts seeking a spirited roadster experience.
Price: The Urvan starts at ₱2,165,000, roughly ₱415,000 cheaper than the MX‑5’s ₱2,580,000. Warranty: The Urvan offers a 3‑year/100,000 km plan versus the MX‑5’s 5‑year/100,000 km, giving the roadster a slightly longer coverage period.
Power and performance: The MX‑5’s 1998 cc naturally aspirated inline‑4 delivers 184 PS and 205 Nm, while the Urvan’s larger 2488 cc turbocharged diesel produces only 129 PS but a higher torque of 356 Nm, advantageous for hauling.
Practicality: The Urvan’s van body and 3‑door layout accommodate more passengers and cargo, whereas the MX‑5’s sports coupe with only 2 seats is limited to a driver and one passenger.
Transmission & drivetrain: Both use automatic gearboxes (6‑speed vs 5‑speed) and rear‑wheel drive, but the MX‑5’s RWD sports dynamics contrast with the Urvan’s utilitarian setup.
Ultimately, if you need a versatile vehicle for family or commercial use, the Urvan is the logical pick. If your priority is a fun, low‑to‑high performance roadster for weekend drives and you’re willing to pay more, the MX‑5 is worth it.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT costs ₱2,165,000, while the Mazda MX‑5 RF 2.0‑L AT is priced at ₱2,580,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda MX‑5 RF produces 184 PS, higher than the Urvan’s 129 PS.
Which offers better torque for hauling?
The Urvan’s diesel engine delivers 356 Nm, far exceeding the MX‑5’s 205 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting with family?
The Urvan’s van body, 3 doors, and higher torque make it more suitable for family or commercial daily commuting than the MX‑5’s 2‑seat sports coupe.