MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026) MG ₱1,398,888 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,490,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 5-years/100,000km | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | PHEV | Diesel |
| Max Power | 95 PS | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic DHT | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Segment | MPV | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Pearl White, Andes Gray, and Pearl Black | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5350 |
| Width (mm) | 1825 | 1785 |
| Height (mm) | 1800 | 2750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2800 | 3085 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1800 | 1775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 215/55R17 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 215/55R17 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Synthetic Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing fuel efficiency, family space, and modern convenience, the MG G50 PHEV 1.5L is the clear choice. At ₱1,398,888, it is ₱91,112 cheaper than the Toyota Tamaraw. Its 1.5L engine offers 95 PS and 130 Nm of power, while the 5-door layout provides 2+3+2 seating for up to seven passengers. In contrast, the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T costs more, offers only 3 seats, and lacks the extended seating capacity or lower price point. The Tamaraw's 2.4L turbo diesel engine produces 150 PS and 343 Nm, but its manual transmission and RWD layout, combined with a body-on-frame construction, make it less practical for daily family transport compared to the G50's unibody van structure and automatic DHT. Choose the MG G50 for practicality and value; choose the Tamaraw only if you require a single passenger vehicle with higher torque output.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The MG G50 PHEV 1.5L is cheaper at ₱1,398,888 compared to the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T which is priced at ₱1,490,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T is more powerful with 150 PS and 343 Nm of torque, whereas the MG G50 PHEV 1.5L produces 95 PS and 130 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting with family?
The MG G50 PHEV 1.5L is better for family commuting as it offers a 5-door layout with 2+3+2 seating for seven passengers, while the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T is a 3-door van with only 3 seats.
What are the key differences in drivetrain and construction?
The MG G50 PHEV 1.5L uses a FWD drivetrain with an automatic DHT and unibody construction, while the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Mobile Store M/T uses RWD with a manual 5-Speed transmission and body-on-frame construction.