Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) vs Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) vs Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,159,000 | Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone (2025) Suzuki ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1459cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 105 PS | 103 PS |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-Speed | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | MPV | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof | Silky Silver Metallic, Celestial Blue Pearl Metallic, Arctic White, Bluish Black, Granite Gray Metallic |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 3995 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1750 | 1550 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2520 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1260 | 1040 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 37 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/55R17 | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/55R17 | 195/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning Dual | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Mechanical | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) vs Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an MPV with decent power and practicality, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT is recommended over the Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone. The Xpander offers better fuel efficiency at its price point and has more exterior color options. For those prioritizing power, the Suzuki Fronx provides a slight edge with 103 PS compared to the Mitsubishi's 105 PS. However, the Xpander is recommended for daily commuting due to its lower price and practicality.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT offers better fuel efficiency at its price point.
Which car has more power?
The Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone provides a slight edge with 103 PS compared to the Mitsubishi's 105 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT is recommended for daily commuting due to its lower price and practicality.
Which car has more exterior color options?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT offers more exterior color options with Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof, Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof. The Suzuki Fronx GLX 6AT Hybrid Monotone has Silky Silver Metallic, Celestial Blue Pearl Metallic, Arctic White, Bluish Black, Granite Gray Metallic.