Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,880,000 | Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025) Tesla ₱2,109,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3 years or 100,000 kms | 4-year/80,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2488cc | — |
| Valvetrain | 16 Valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 127 PS | 257 PS |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Executive Sedan |
| Segment | Van | Sedan |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black | Red Multi-Coat, Pearl White Multi-Coat, Solid Black, Deep Blue Metallic, Midnight Silver |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 15 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5320 | 4720 |
| Width (mm) | 1880 | 2089 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1441 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2875 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2190 | 1760 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Upper and lower control arms | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Leaf Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15 | 235/45R18 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15 | 235/45R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Mechanical | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for practicality and affordability, the Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T is recommended. It offers better power-to-price ratio with its 127 PS and 356 Nm of torque at a lower price point of ₱1,880,000 compared to the Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range at ₱2,109,000. The Nissan NV350 is also more practical with its 15 passenger capacity and body-on-frame construction which ensures durability and safety. However, if you prioritize electric powertrain, advanced features, and a sleek design, the Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range would be the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan does not have fuel efficiency data provided. The Tesla Model 3 uses electric power which generally offers better energy efficiency compared to diesel vehicles.
How much more powerful is the Tesla Model 3 compared to the Nissan NV350?
The Tesla Model 3 has significantly more power with a maximum output of 257 PS, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T has a maximum power of only 127 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T is more suitable for daily commuting due to its practicality with 15 passenger capacity and body-on-frame construction, which ensures durability and safety.
What are the exterior colors available on each vehicle?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T comes in Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black. The Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range offers Red Multi-Coat, Pearl White Multi-Coat, Solid Black, Deep Blue Metallic, Midnight Silver.