Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification |
Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015)
Suzuki
₱975,000
|
Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) Toyota ₱1,025,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 139 PS |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Van |
| Segment | MPV | Van |
| Construction | Body on Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+10 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 4968 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 2097 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1270 | 1905 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers needing a rugged, high-capacity utility vehicle, the 2025 Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van is the better choice despite its higher price (₱1,025,000 vs ₱975,000). It offers significantly more power (139 PS vs 91 PS) and torque (183 Nm vs 127 Nm), a larger 2.0L engine, and a 10-seat capacity (2+10) ideal for passenger or cargo use. Its body-on-frame construction and RWD drivetrain ensure durability for rough roads. However, the Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT is more affordable, has a 5-door design (easier access for 8 passengers), and comes in more color options. The APV's smaller engine and lower power make it less suited for heavy loads or highway overtaking. For daily commuting with moderate passenger needs, the APV's lower price and 8-seat layout may suffice. But for businesses, family transport, or frequent heavy use, the Tamaraw's superior power, torque, and seating capacity justify the ₱50,000 premium. Both have similar warranties (3 years/100,000 km), but the Tamaraw is a 2025 model with a more modern DOHC engine.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT is cheaper at ₱975,000, while the Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van costs ₱1,025,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Tamaraw is more powerful with 139 PS and 183 Nm torque, compared to the Suzuki APV's 91 PS and 127 Nm.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Toyota Tamaraw seats up to 12 (2+10), while the Suzuki APV seats 8 (2+3+3).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki APV is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, 5-door design for easier access, and smaller size. However, the Tamaraw offers more power for highway driving.