Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱889,000 | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 125 PS @ 3700 rpm | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4245 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1708 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2521 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 16 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Polyurethane | Cloth |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle with decent power output, the Ford Ranger 2.2 Base is the better choice. Despite being discontinued, it offers better towing capacity and higher torque compared to the Ford Ecosport. The Ecosport, while more recent, has slightly better fuel efficiency and more doors but falls short in terms of towing capability.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Ford Ranger 2.2 Base and Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 Base (₱889,000) is slightly cheaper than the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (₱958,000).
Which vehicle has better power output and why does it matter for a Filipino buyer?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 Base is better suited for daily commuting due to its higher torque and more practical seating layout (2+3 instead of 5 doors).
What are the key differences between the two vehicles that a Filipino buyer should consider when choosing one over the other?
Key differences include power output, towing capacity, and fuel efficiency. The Ranger offers better towing capacity and higher torque compared to the Ecosport, which has slightly better fuel efficiency but fewer doors.