Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱889,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 125 PS @ 3700 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Polyurethane | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4x2 MT (2013) and the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) hinges on your primary need. The Ranger is a body-on-frame pickup with a turbo diesel engine producing 125 PS and 330 Nm of torque, making it ideal for heavy-duty work, off-road capability, and towing. However, it is discontinued, has a manual transmission, and is priced at ₱889,000. The Ertiga, at ₱865,000, is a current model unibody MPV with a gasoline engine (96 PS, 130 Nm) and a 4-speed automatic, offering better fuel efficiency for city driving and seating for 7 passengers (2+2+3). If you need a workhorse for cargo or rough terrain, choose the Ranger. For a family vehicle for daily commuting and occasional long trips, the Ertiga is more practical, cheaper, and easier to drive in traffic. The Ertiga also has a more modern model year and is still available new.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT is cheaper at ₱865,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱889,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has a more powerful engine with 125 PS and 330 Nm torque, while the Suzuki Ertiga produces 96 PS and 130 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, smaller size, and gasoline engine, which offers better fuel economy in stop-and-go traffic.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Suzuki Ertiga seats 7 passengers (2+2+3), while the Ford Ranger seats only 5 (2+3).