Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) Chevrolet ₱908,888 | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1793cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4597 | 4245 |
| Width (mm) | 1788 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1708 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2685 | 2521 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/60/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Cloth |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking to purchase a car in 2015, the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT is generally more suitable and advantageous compared to the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT. The Cruze offers better power output with 141 PS at 6300 rpm vs. 110 PS at 6300 rpm for the Ecosport, making it a better choice for those who prioritize performance and acceleration. Additionally, the Cruze's FWD configuration is more practical for daily commuting and urban driving conditions compared to the RWD of the Ecosport which may not handle well in heavy rain or snow. Despite its higher price point, the Cruze also comes with a 100,000km/3-years warranty, ensuring peace of mind on the road.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between Chevrolet Cruze and Ford Ecosport?
The Chevrolet Cruze at ₱908,888 is cheaper than the Ford Ecosport at ₱958,000.
Which car has better power output?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT has a higher maximum power of 141 PS compared to the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT's 110 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Cruze with FWD configuration is better suited for daily commuting and urban driving conditions, while the Ford Ecosport with RWD may not handle well in heavy rain or snow.
Which car has a longer warranty period?
Both cars come with a 100,000km/3-years warranty. However, the Chevrolet Cruze offers better power output and is more practical for daily use.