Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Honda City 1.5 VX+ CVT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Honda City 1.5 VX+ CVT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Honda City 1.5 VX+ CVT (2015) Honda ₱1,003,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 120 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 145Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4440 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1477 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2600 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1121 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 40 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | Independent MacPherson w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | H-Shaped Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16x6.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16x6.0 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Type with Touch Panel Controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Smart Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Multi-Reflector Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | 20.99 |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | 31.03 |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 26.01 |
| Emission Standard | — | Euro4 |
| Euro NCAP Rating | — | 5 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Honda City 1.5 VX+ CVT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical small SUV or hatchback, the Ford Ecosport stands out with its better power-to-price ratio and more comprehensive features compared to the Honda City. The Ecosport offers 110 PS at 6300 rpm, while the Honda City has only 120 PS at 6600 rpm. Additionally, the Ecosport comes with a 6-speed automatic transmission, which is preferable for smoother driving and better fuel efficiency. For those who prioritize features and practicality over sheer power, the Ford Ecosport is the clear choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle should I choose if I need more power?
The Honda City offers slightly higher horsepower at 120 PS compared to the Ford Ecosport's 110 PS. However, the difference in power isn't significant enough to sway a decision for most buyers.
Is the Ford Ecosport better suited for city driving or long trips?
The Honda City has better fuel economy with higher combined efficiency at 26.01 kmpl compared to the Ford Ecosport's 25.01 kmpl. However, both vehicles are suitable for daily commuting and longer journeys.
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ecosport starts at ₱958,000, while the Honda City costs ₱1,003,000. The Ford Ecosport is a better value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.
What transmission type does each vehicle have?
The Ford Ecosport comes with a 6-speed automatic transmission (A/T), offering smoother driving and better fuel efficiency. The Honda City has a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which can be less efficient than an A/T in terms of fuel economy.