Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LT (2016) Chevrolet ₱865,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1485cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 109 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.2 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4300 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1735 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1504 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2499 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut-type and Stabilizer bar |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Rear Tosrion beam non-independent |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16 Aluminum |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16 Aluminum |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle, the Ford Ecosport stands out as the better choice. It offers more power with its naturally aspirated engine producing 110 PS at 6300 rpm compared to Chevrolet Sail's 109 PS at 6000 rpm. The Ford also has a longer wheelbase and a higher seating capacity, making it suitable for families or those who frequently transport goods. Additionally, the Ecosport’s RWD setup provides better handling in urban conditions. For daily commuting, the Ford is more practical with its larger interior space and more powerful engine.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Ford Ecosport and Chevrolet Sail?
The Chevrolet Sail is slightly cheaper at ₱865,888 compared to the Ford Ecosport's ₱958,000.
Which vehicle has better power performance?
The Ford Ecosport outperforms the Chevrolet Sail with 110 PS for the Ford and 109 PS for the Chevrolet Sail at their respective RPMs.
Which car is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Ford Ecosport is more suitable for daily commuting due to its larger interior space, better power output, and RWD setup providing improved handling in urban conditions.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
Both vehicles offer the same warranty of 100,000 km/3-years, so there's no difference in terms of warranty duration between these two models.