Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT (2015) Lifan ₱498,000 Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Current Discontinued
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1342cc 1373cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve with VVT
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 88 PS @ 6000 rpm 98 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque 110 Nm @ 3000 - 5000 rpm 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain FWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Hatchback MPV
Segment A M
Construction Unibody Body On Frame
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+2+3
Length (mm) 3745 4265
Width (mm) 1620 1695
Height (mm) 1430 1685
Wheelbase (mm) 2340 2740
Curb Weight (kg) 900 1180
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson MacPherson with Coil Spring
Rear Suspension MacPherson Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring
Front Wheels 14x5.0" Alloys 15 Alloy
Rear Wheels 14x5.0" Alloys 15 Alloy
Front Tires 165/70/R14 185/65 R15
Rear Tires 165/70/R14 185/65 R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Disc
Steering Type hydraulic electronic
Steering Column tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Engine Immobilizer Yes
Security Alarm Yes
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Automatic Air Conditioning
Rear A/C Vents No No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB No Yes
AUX Input No No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No Yes
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Speakers 4-Speakers
CD Player Yes
Lighting
Headlights Halogen + Foglamps Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable hatchback with reasonable power and practicality, the Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT is the better choice. It offers comparable engine performance but at a significantly lower price point of ₱498k compared to the Suzuki Ertiga GL's ₱712k. The Lifan also has more doors (5 vs 5), making it slightly more versatile for larger groups or families.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper between the Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT and the Suzuki Ertiga GL?

The Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT is cheaper at ₱498,000 compared to the Suzuki Ertiga GL's price of ₱712,000.

Which vehicle has better power output?

Both vehicles have similar engine specifications with the Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT producing slightly less max torque (110 Nm vs 130 Nm) but more max power (88 PS vs 98 PS). However, these differences are minor and might not significantly impact daily driving.

Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?

The Lifan 320 EX Hatchback MT's lower price point makes it a more affordable option for daily commuting. Additionally, its longer wheelbase of 3745mm compared to the Ertiga's 4265mm might provide slightly more comfort and stability during long commutes.

Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?

The data provided does not include information on fuel consumption or mileage. However, considering similar engine specifications and assuming comparable driving habits, both vehicles are likely to have similar fuel efficiency levels for their respective segments.