Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱735,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2477cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 8valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 21.1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-2 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | AUV | Sedan |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 10 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4345 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1650 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1800 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1485 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14 x 5.0JJ Steel | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14 x 5.0JJ Steel | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185 R14C-8PR | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185 R14C-8PR | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power |
| Steering Column | no | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and practicality, the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) is the more sensible choice despite its higher price tag of ₱841,000. The Vios offers a modern unibody sedan layout, front‑wheel drive and a 99 PS naturally‑aspirated gasoline engine that delivers 123 Nm of torque, giving it a clear edge in performance over the older Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015), which only produces 75 PS and 149 Nm from a larger 2.5‑L diesel unit. The Adventure’s body‑on‑frame construction and rear‑wheel drive are suited to light off‑road or utility tasks, but the model is discontinued, meaning parts and service may be harder to find. Its five‑door AUV body provides more cargo space and seating for five, yet the lower power and outdated Euro‑2 emissions make it less efficient for city driving. The Vios, with its four‑door sedan body, CVT transmission and contemporary safety and comfort features (though not listed, they are typical of current models), is better suited for daily commuting and urban use. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty, but the Vios’ ongoing production ensures better resale value and dealer support. Choose the Adventure only if you need a rugged, higher‑ground‑clearance vehicle and can accept limited after‑sales support; otherwise, the Vios offers superior power, refinement and long‑term practicality for most Filipino drivers.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) is cheaper at ₱735,000, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) costs ₱841,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Vios produces 99 PS, compared to the Mitsubishi Adventure’s 75 PS, making the Vios the more powerful option.
Is the Mitsubishi Adventure still available?
No, the Adventure is listed as discontinued, whereas the Vios is a current model.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Vios, with its front‑wheel‑drive sedan layout, CVT transmission and higher power output, is better suited for city commuting than the rear‑wheel‑drive, body‑on‑frame Adventure.