Suzuki Celerio 1.0 MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Celerio 1.0 MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Celerio 1.0 MT (2015) Suzuki ₱558,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 996cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 68 PS @ 6000 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 90 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3500 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1600 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1470 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2360 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 890 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 155/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 155/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Celerio 1.0 MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer on a tight budget, the 2015 Suzuki Celerio 1.0 MT is the clear choice. Priced at ₱558,000, it is roughly ₱283,000 cheaper than the 2016 Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT, making it attractive for first‑time owners or those needing an affordable city run‑around. The Celerio’s compact 3500 mm length and five‑door hatchback layout provide easy maneuverability and versatile cargo access, ideal for congested Manila streets and tight parking. However, its 68 PS output and 90 Nm torque are modest, so expect slower acceleration and limited highway overtaking power. The Vios, at ₱841,000, sits in the B‑segment with a longer 4410 mm sedan body, offering a more refined ride, four doors, and a stronger 99 PS/123 Nm engine paired with a CVT for smoother city cruising. Its larger size also yields a roomier cabin for rear passengers. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and front‑wheel drive layout. Choose the Celerio if you prioritize low purchase cost, ultra‑compact size, and hatchback practicality for daily urban trips. Opt for the Vios if you can stretch the budget for extra power, a sedan’s comfort, and a slightly more spacious interior for longer commutes or family use.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Suzuki Celerio 1.0 MT costs ₱558,000, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT is priced at ₱841,000, making the Celerio about ₱283,000 cheaper.
Which model has more power?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT produces 99 PS and 123 Nm of torque, compared to the Suzuki Celerio’s 68 PS and 90 Nm, giving the Vios a clear power advantage.
What are the body type and size differences?
The Celerio is a 5‑door hatchback measuring 3500 mm in length, while the Vios is a 4‑door sedan at 4410 mm, offering more interior space but a larger footprint.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the city?
Both have front‑wheel drive and similar warranties, but the Celerio’s lower price, compact size, and hatchback design make it more suited for tight city driving, whereas the Vios offers more power and comfort for longer commutes if budget allows.