Chevrolet Colorado 4×2 2.8D AT LT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 4×2 2.8D AT LT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 4×2 2.8D AT LT (2017) Chevrolet ₱1,264,888 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,159,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2779cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3800 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5361 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2123 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1798 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 0 | 2775 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 Alloy | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Alloy | 17 |
| Front Tires | 245/70 R 16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70 R 16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning Dual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Chevrolet Colorado 4×2 2.8D AT LT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a reliable and practical vehicle with good fuel efficiency, the Chevrolet Colorado 4×2 2.8D AT LT is recommended over the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT. The Colorado offers superior power and torque for towing and off-road conditions, making it more suitable for those who need a pickup truck for work or leisure activities. Additionally, its longer warranty (100,000 km/3-years) provides peace of mind compared to the shorter 100,000 km/3-years offered by Mitsubishi.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Chevrolet Colorado has a higher max power output at 200 PS @ 3800 rpm compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander's 105 PS.
Is one of these vehicles better for daily commuting than the other?
Daily commuting considerations are generally more about fuel efficiency and ease of use. The Colorado is front-wheel drive, which can be easier for city driving, while the Xpander has a longer wheelbase and more seats, making it suitable for families with children.
Which vehicle offers better towing capacity?
The Chevrolet Colorado 4×2 model comes equipped with an inline-4 engine capable of producing up to 500 Nm of torque at 2000 rpm, which is ideal for towing. The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT has a naturally aspirated engine that produces less power and torque, making it unsuitable for towing heavy loads.
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency?
The Chevrolet Colorado has a diesel engine with higher torque output, which can be more efficient for certain driving conditions. However, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT also features a naturally aspirated 4-cylinder engine designed to achieve decent fuel economy, making it competitive in this area.